Bookmark and Share

(Campaign For Liberty – Sheldon Richman)

If the politicians who are bent on redesigning the medical and medical-insurance industries really wanted only to curb rising prices and help the uninsured get coverage, they would have zeroed in on the previous government interventions that created those problems. Instead, they are pushing grand schemes to turn our medical decision-making over to bureaucrats. That indicates that the so-called reform campaign is about power.

Medical care is too expensive. Prices for services rise faster than other prices, and there’s reason to believe much of the money is wasted. Expensive medical care equates to expensive insurance, which prices some people out of the market.

This has been called a failure of the free market, but that can’t be: There is no free market. I defy the advocates of government control to name one aspect of medicine or insurance that government doesn’t dominate.

The anti-market system politicians have put in place — as pleasing as it is for the insurance and pharmaceutical industries and organized medicine — harms the public. Yet it would be easy for them remove the harmful interventions.

For example, they could end the adverse tax treatment of people who buy their own insurance. If your employer buys insurance for you, it’s paid for with pretax dollars. If you buy your own, you pay with after-tax dollars. That’s a hefty penalty. But the price of avoiding that penalty is high: You must cede control over thousands of dollars in cash wages as well as your medical coverage to your employer. You can’t tailor coverage to your own needs. To get a better plan you have to change jobs. That’s just stupid.

The system creates the incentive to overspend on medical services. Since insurance premiums appear to be paid by your employer and since the policy covers routine elective services and tests, you have no reason to shop wisely in the medical marketplace. That’s one reason for the price inflation. Why ask about the price or the necessity of a test if someone else seems to be footing the bill? Doctors know that and will err on the side of more rather than fewer services.

If the politicians really cared about high prices and lack of choice, they would remove the tax penalty. Do those in power even talk about it? No.

State governments make a bad system worse by mandating that “basic” policies cover many services for which most people would not buy insurance if they were explicitly paying the bill, such as acupuncture, hair transplants, contraceptives, and more. These mandates are state-granted privileges for the providers, who would rather lobby for their profits than have to attract willing customers. Every mandate raises the price of insurance and pushes young and low-income people out of the market. Without those mandates, many people would buy low-priced, high-deductible catastrophic insurance. Government creates many of those uninsured the politicians cry their crocodile tears over.

If politicians really cared about high costs and lack of choice, they would neutralize coverage mandates by removing the federal ban on interstate insurance sales. Then a resident of a high-mandate state, such as California, could buy a policy offered in a low-mandate, such as Arizona.

The government forces prices higher in many other ways. Medicare, for example, gives a virtual blank check to its beneficiaries, who have no reason to be cost-conscious about the services they buy. Retirees have gotten far more in benefits than they ever paid in taxes while working. As long as Medicare exists, everyone’s medical services will be artificially expensive. Medicare is doubly offensive: The money is taken from current workers, and when it is spent it bids up the price of medical services for those workers. Considering its $37 trillion unfunded liability, Medicare is the disaster some people predicted when it was set up in 1965. As long as it exists the medical system will be awry and government will exert control.

Government also raises medical prices by sponsoring a protectionist medical guild in each state, keeping the number of doctors low and prices and incomes high. Occupational licensing is a conspiracy against the public masquerading as consumer protection.

Yes, we suffer from monopoly and high prices. Government is the reason.

November 20, 2009

7 Comments to "Health-Care “Reform”: It’s All About Power"

  • dba Says:

    Government is not reason, it is not eloquence, it is force; like fire, a troublesome servant and a fearful master. Never for a moment should it be left to irresponsible action.

    Geo. Washington

    [Reply]

  • Jim Says:

    End the corruption of our government NOW!!!!!!!

    I would like to propose a new bill to end corruption in government.

    Very simply if a member of government is found guilty of corruption for an amount equal to one years salary of the typical American poverty level they should be beaten or get 20 lashes or some other type of physical punishment.

    If found guilty of corruption for an amount equivalent to 2 years the typical poverty level, than they should receive the above sentence plus loose their position with the government.

    If found guilty of corruption for an amount equivalent to 3 years the typical poverty level they should get the above plus have all their possessions taken by the state.

    If found guilty of corruption for an amount equivalent to 4 years the typical poverty level they should get all of the above plus a death sentence.

    Simple, I have been told this would never work because of all the attorney and court cost. Bull Shxt, think about the amount of time, money and resources we are loosing everyday because of the corruption that runs rampant in our government.

    This is just a suggestion for a bill I’m sure it will need some tweaking, so lets get it going America.

    [Reply]

    Jim Reply:

    Do you think this would give our government officials the incentive to get back on the straight and narrow path and stay there?

    [Reply]

    jack brumby Reply:

    Jim,
    No , I do not think it is an incentive but you are on the right track. You gave them 4 chances , that’s 3 too many. How about this : If found guilty of any offense that discredits in any form the position of the office you so freely ran for as a servant to & for the public your reward will be as follows :
    1) Removal from office.
    2) Banned from elected office for life.
    3) Confiscation of all assets aquired while in office.
    4) Fine to equal 3 times the amount of damage done by your actions.
    5) Prison & or traitors death to be determined by a jury of the public.
    Now the above is for people who willingly knew their action/deeds were of not good standings.
    Now for people who were just plain foolish or honestly saw no harm in their actions, should be as follows :
    1) First offense;
    a) restitution for damages done.
    b) letter of reprimand
    c) consideration of mandatory termination of term.
    2) Second offense;
    a) double restitution of damages done.
    b) banned on running for any future terms or positions of elected office.
    c) Consideration of prison time.
    3) Third offense;
    a) Termination of office.
    b) Confiscation of all assets attained while in office.
    c) Mandatory prison time.
    I do not believe this will solve all corruption but I feel it is a good start. After all what politicians wants to meet bubba behind bars ?

    [Reply]

    dba Reply:

    Jack

    you left one off :

    death by hanging

  • jack brumby Says:

    dba ,
    Sir, I don’t believe I did. May not have highlighted properly but check out Item #5 for the willful rats.
    Unless you mean for the lower section & yes you are correct. Those individuals I felt were honest in heart but just incompetent hapless souls who truely knew no better.

    [Reply]

    dba Reply:

    I stand corrected

    [Reply]

Leave a Reply

.