by Ralph Kermit Winterrowd

In 8 U.S.C. § 1182(f), which is an unambiguous codified  Statute of the United States that PRECLUDES all judicial actions; and, the term of “aliens” defined as “means” is the  exclusive use required as defined in 8 U.S.C. § 1101(a)(3) and then check out definitions of 8 U.S.C. § 1101(a)(21 & 22).

There is NO mention of “Muslims” or “Islam” as the use of “means” limits the use of “aliens” to the exclusive to the “term” definition.   Groman v. Commissioner, 302 U.S. 82, 86, (1937) “[W]hen an exclusive definition is intended the word ‘means’ is employed,”

I have attached a module on “unambiguous” and “means.”

Also it seems to me that this issue was determined in United States ex rel Knauff v. Shaughnessy, 338 U.S. 537, 543-544 (Sup.Ct. 1950) 

Attachments:

8 U.S.C. § 1182(f)—Inadmissible Aliens

8 U.S.C. § 1101(a)(3), (a)(21 & 22)[pg. 12]—Definitions – “aliens”, “national” & “national of the United States”

Unambiguous module

Means module 

Comments Welcome. 

DoJ attorney oral argument was a “D “  – not good, but with Sessions in, that will change I am sure.

Ralph