7 Yrs. Of Massive Monetary “Stimulus” Since Initial August/07 Rate Cut: Anemic 0.9% Real GDP Growth Rate Since
July 30, 2014 in News by RBN Staff
Source: David Stockmans Contra Corner
In light of second quarter GDP’s imminent release and the explosion of commentary it will undoubtedly create, I thought it useful to promote a better context that includes all pertinent variables of analysis and judgment. As I said earlier today on CNBC with Rick Santelli, it is often overlooked that the US economy has been undergoing “stimulus” courses for just shy of seven years. On September 18, 2007, the Federal Reserve reduced its target for the federal funds rate by a hefty 50 bps. They thought it was appropriate given the “irregularities” in funding markets that had “suddenly” appeared early that August. Contradicting the “subprime is contained” narrative, the FOMC initiated the rate measure not just for financial purposes, but, in their own words:
Economic growth was moderate during the first half of the year, but the tightening of credit conditions has the potential to intensify the housing correction and to restrain economic growth more generally. Today’s action is intended to help forestall some of the adverse effects on the broader economy that might otherwise arise from the disruptions in financial markets and to promote moderate growth over time.
The key phrase I think demands highlight is, “promote moderate growth over time.” Since this was the first instigation of “stimulus”, it should be judged on exactly those terms. From Q4 2007 forward, GDP growth has averaged just 0.22% per quarter, or a wholly disgusting 0.90% SAAR. Foreseen or not, the Great Recession and its recovery has made a mockery of “stimulus”, and of all varieties.
But where the monetarists really escape accountability is in timing. For some reason, conventional opinion gives the Fed the benefit of the doubt about the occurrence of financial irregularities and thus everything downstream from them. The housing bubble came from somewhere, as did the dot-com bubble before it. Ben Bernanke was Time’s person of the year because it is simply assumed that monetary policy saved the US from a worse fate.
Even if that was the case, it has been entirely undone, and then some, by what has happened since. The net for the whole cycle is now negative, whether or not you believe Bernanke as a 2009 hero, as I will labor to illustrate below.
The current PR manufacturing has been using the labor market as a waypoint for monetary success despite the fact that it has taken 76 months just to “achieve” the last cycle peak (into which we are still 3.7 million full-time jobs below November 2007). That is not success at all, but rather further evidence of total failure. What is lost in the mix of renewed bubbles and bond market disruptions is that time is the biggest factor in all finance. Albert Einstein gets credit for the quote, though who knows where it actually came from, but the observation is mathematic in both its simplicity and power – compound interest is the most powerful force in the universe. That introduces, not unlike general relativity, time as a primary variable.
What that means in the context of a sluggish recovery, where “stimulus” is even partially ineffective, is that the more time it takes opportunity costs rise geometrically. I’m not just referring to the typical orthodox trope of labor losing skills, etc., but rather opportunity cost of not trying something else.
What follows is pure counterfactual for the sake of discussion. The primary argument in favor of all this monetarism in the context of the Great Recession cycle is that it at least kept the Great Recession from getting worse. However, if the “cost” of that assumed benefit is the recovery as it has been, then we might well re-examine the idea of time and compounding. In other words, maybe we should actually accept a worse contraction if it means a better recovery – the infamous symmetry of the “V.”
What is shown immediately above is the track of nominal GDP since the end of 2007, with the average recovery growth rate plotted to show that you end up in the same place regardless of factoring time when changes are very small. Normally, under a compounding regime, it is far better, given real world lumpiness, to gain larger growth earlier in the timeline.
For the sake of argument, we can assume a far worse contraction period, giving monetarism the benefit of the argument about effectiveness as some sort of economic cushioning (which I by no means believe actually happened – there really is no empirical or even philosophical reason to think “emergency” measures had any true benefit whatsoever, particularly given the Keystone cops nature of it all and its persistent failures in even the most basic of functions).
Under the recovery tracks shown above, mimicking what actually was “gained”, you can see that the “cushion” idea would seem to make sense. It would be much better to attempt to limit the downside if the upside is so much degraded. But compounding also becomes clear, as just a minor increase in the recovery growth rate, even given the much larger contraction, nearly closes the gap at the end (Q1 2014).
However, if we use historical growth rates from prior recoveries, it clearly shows that recovery rates are more meaningful across larger time spaces than the contraction. It’s not really that close in terms of comparison.
While the housing bubble’s inefficient and ultimately unsatisfying recovery matches the actual GDP trajectory, again despite a much larger contraction, by the middle of 2012, the 1992-95 recovery period surpasses the recent record in the middle of 2011 before ending up significantly above (which would only continue from here on). Given that scenario, it would seem more beneficial to take the worse contraction and with it a better recovery track.
If we use the recovery from the mid-1980’s, there is a wholly different scaling involved as compounding in growth becomes nearly unstoppable.
By 2014, the economy is nearly $2.5 trillion greater (nominal GDP) at $18.28 trillion.
I am not by any means suggesting that the 1980’s growth rates are likely without so much monetarism, but rather I only mean to show the fallacy of conventional wisdom about the role of “stimulus.” If you believe monetary policy is effective in cushioning the dislocation on the way down, then you have to at least account for the lack of symmetry on the way back up. I doubt any othodoxists will connect the easy dots and see monetarism as a primary cause of that asymmetry in cycle, but unbiased observers must at least note the correlation, and then the possibilities that follow.
If that is indeed the case, and monetarism is downgrading the recovery, stretching it out further in time (a lower slope), then you have to assess that damage against the idea shown above – that it would be better to risk a bigger contraction at the outset and thus not disturb the recovery. In fact, that is exactly how the orthodox practitioners think about monetary policy, in terms of stretching out any cycle. The only deviation in the Great Recession was that they never believed it was possible to see such a massive downside force.
So why is it not possible to have both, the large contraction and the elongated cycle? To think that monetary policy is not having that same effect simply because the downswing was greater than modeled is beyond naïve. And that would lead you to at least entertain the idea that the scale of the contraction is actually secondary, and that perhaps the Fed might have been better off not trying to interfere in any of it.
Again, I don’t believe the recession would have been worse without the Fed, as much of what transpired took place without much regard to interest rates and childish appeals to psychology, but even if you do that may not matter in the long run. Ineffectiveness means exactly that. However, what follows from that in terms of the recovery is far, far worse. Let the economy take its own course, even if that means greater pain in the short run, as compounding over the longer term fixes that cyclical inadequacy. The bottom line is that “stimulus” failure has very real costs, and the longer it goes the worse it becomes.
I’m typically to blogging and i truly appreciate your content. The write-up has actually peaks my interest. I’m going to bookmark your site and keep checking for new information and facts.
jordans free shipping http://www.facecool.com/profiles/blogs/7-the-essence-of-having-a-fly-fishing-reels-in-fishing-activity
Aw, this was a seriously nice post. In idea I would like to put in writing like this furthermore – taking time and actual effort to make a especially superior article?- but what can I say?- I procrastinate alot and by no indicates seem to obtain some thing carried out.
cheap jordans http://gofishtalk.com/profiles/blogs/what-are-the-advantages-of-a-cinder-block-garden
Aw, this was a seriously nice post. In concept I would like to put in writing like this additionally – taking time and actual effort to make a extremely good article?- but what can I say?- I procrastinate alot and by no indicates appear to get something completed.
cheap air jordans http://www.uninoo.com/member/blog_post_view.php?postId=210449
Oh my goodness! an stunning article dude. Thank you Then again I am experiencing concern with ur rss . Do not know why Unable to subscribe to it. Is there any person obtaining identical rss predicament? Anybody who knows kindly respond. Thnkx
buy jordans http://www.indyarocks.com/blog/1694619/Buy-Jordan-Xx3-Red-And-White-Sneakers
Aw, this was a really nice post. In thought I would like to put in writing like this furthermore – taking time and actual effort to create a extremely superb article?- but what can I say?- I procrastinate alot and by no indicates appear to obtain something accomplished.
jordans for cheap http://www.blueworld.co.za/blogs/1assistance-discovering-retailers-with-low-cost-jerseys-cheapestjordans
I’d have to check with you here. Which isn’t some thing I ordinarily do! I get pleasure from reading a post that will make consumers feel. Also, thanks for permitting me to comment!
cheap jordans http://www.aduun.com/member/blog_post_view.php?postId=38938
I discovered your blog internet site on google and check some of your early posts. Continue to keep up the extremely excellent operate. I just extra up your RSS feed to my MSN News Reader. Searching for forward to reading a lot more from you later on!
jordans cheap http://www.jordan13cheap.com
There is certainly noticeably a bundle to understand about this. I assume you made specific nice points in functions also.
jordan shoes http://www.jordan13cheap.com
The next time I read a blog, I hope that it doesnt disappoint me as much as this 1. I mean, I know it was my selection to read, but I in fact thought youd have some thing interesting to say. All I hear can be a bunch of whining about something that you could fix in the event you werent too busy searching for attention.
cheap jordans http://www.aduun.com/member/blog_post_view.php?postId=38938
Ideal headphonesget, well listed additionally exactly what are revealed. Breathtaking gift box and also poem always enclosed. Awesome for mother’s evening!
wonderful seller, fast shipment – would buy from again a++++++++++
My personal boy gave myself this for the moms time. He knows im maybe not around price still things comes from the particular heart. I cannot know it has my favourite color furthermore actually meets my wrist. I did not might find out bracelets to suit headphonesmy slight wrist. Very pleased to come with recieved this particular as being a present.
Very good headphoneschoose, well cost plus what are presented. Perfect gift package to poem furthermore enclosed. Awesome of mother’s evening!
I had gotten your headphonesto the mom of mothers evening, as well as she definitely loved it! It really is completely adorable headphonesand suggesting in the card that will goes in box is very emotional!! And the high quality of the beads are very good!
I had gotten our headphonesfor the our mom concerning moms evening, plus she completely liked this! It really is quite pretty headphonesas well as the saying regarding the card you already know goes within the container is really emotional!! And premium of beads is actually ideal!
Well mother’s time present. Conversely, your bracelet got also very long on arrive, and it arrived after the vacation. My personal mother conveyed it she liked on bracelet, although I’ve maybe not viewed this girl wear this though. 🙂
If the price is very low, you can understand that this replica is made from materials that won’t last long.
I got that headphonesconcerning my mother for the moms evening, furthermore she definitely liked this! It is quite sweet headphonesand the saying on the card that will goes in container is really sentimental!! And excellence of beads are very good!
A lot of these survived me personally regarding Four years. they may be positively astonishing and i Take pleasure in coach. :)))
When I originally commented I clicked the -Notify me when new comments are added- checkbox and now each and every time a comment is added I get 4 emails using the same comment. Is there any way you’re able to take away me from that service? Thanks!
jordans outlet http://airjordansisq.bloguez.com/airjordansisq/5951880/Air_Jordans_Is_Now_One_of_the_Most_Well-known_Brands_Of_Shoes#.UoMssqxbKjA
It’s tough to obtain knowledgeable men and women on this topic, but you sound like you know what you’re talking about! Thanks
jordan shoes http://airjordansqqq.jigsy.com/entries/general/quite-low-cost-jordans-how-you-can-come-across-incredibly-low-priced-jordans-around-the-net
I’m impressed, I should say. Truly rarely do I encounter a blog that’s both educative and entertaining, and let me tell you, you have hit the nail on the head. Your thought is outstanding; the issue is some thing that not enough people are speaking intelligently about. I am quite happy that I stumbled across this in my search for some thing relating to this.
jordans free shipping http://jordansoutletgg.wix.com/jordansoutletgg0
you’ve an awesome blog here! would you like to create some invite posts on my weblog?
shoes jordans http://www.nexopia.com/users/jordanslafg/blog/1-lowpriced-jordans-can-they-really-often-be-authentic-jordans
highly nice post, i surely really like this webpage, maintain on it
air jordans http://www.freewebsite-service.com/airjordansqqq/Blog.php?id=185609&snavn=What+Are+Virtual+Private+Servers+And+How+Do+They+Function
This web site is certainly a walk-through for all of the information you wanted about this and didn’t know who to ask. Glimpse here, and you’ll certainly discover it.
jordan shoes http://jordansoutleth.yolasite.com/
There is noticeably a bundle to understand about this. I assume you produced particular nice points in functions also.
cheap jordans http://shoesjordansii.blogger.hu/2013/11/30/aladdin-travel-mug-item-critiques
you’ve got a terrific blog here! would you like to make some invite posts on my weblog?
jordans for cheap http://www.bikerlife.co.uk/community/blogs.php?action=show_member_post&ownerID=3559&post_id=4997