Earlier this week, lawmakers in the Democrat-led Golden State approved AB 20098.

The New York Times summarized the passing of the measure as, “California Approves Bill to Punish Doctors Who Spread False Information.”

If California’s Democrat Governor Gavin Newsom signs the bill into law when it lands on his desk, the state will establish a “Disinformation Authority” that would investigate doctors for contradicting the official proclamation on Covid treatments.

A group of doctors, the Physicians for Informed Consent (PIC), opposes the legislation.

The PIC is pushing back against the bill on the grounds that it would “intimidate” physicians into silence when advising their patients.

The group explains in a statement that the law unconstitutionally targets them, “attempting to intimidate by investigation, censor and sanction physicians who publicly disagree with the government’s ever-evolving, erratic, and contradictory public health Covid-19 edicts.”

In an effort to derail the bill, the group has filed a lawsuit seeking an injunction to prevent the Medical Board of California from acting on the law.

The doctors argue that the bill’s definition of “misinformation” is “hopelessly vague,” according to The Post Millennial.

According to the lawsuit, if Newsom enacts the law, it would suddenly revise the legal definition of “unprofessional conduct” in a medical capacity, a term that carries a lot of weight in the world of medical regulation.

The Medical Board of California states this is presently defined as “breach of confidence, record alteration, filing fraudulent insurance claims, misleading advertising, failure to sign death certificates in a timely manner, failure to provide medical records to a patient, patient abandonment, etc.”

However, there is a lot of law that rests on that one definition, and altering it capriciously or carelessly is inherently dangerous.

Yet, that’s precisely what this law does.

In the bill, AB 2098, the text makes seemingly intentionally-vague references to “misinformation” and “disinformation.”

In Section 3 of the bill’s “definitions,” it states:

“‘Disinformation’ means misinformation that the licensee deliberately disseminated with malicious intent or an intent to mislead.”

“‘Misinformation’ means false information that is contradicted by contemporary scientific consensus contrary to the standard of care.”

By introducing a skewed “definition” of the word “misinformation,” the California bill creates vagueness.

By resting the definition on a patently nonsensical notion like “contemporary scientific consensus,” and by hinging its definition of “disinformation” on the skewed definition of “misinformation,” it would produce a law that’s dangerously vague.

The vagueness in the language appears deliberately done so that the punishment can be applied arbitrarily, at the whims of those in authority.

It is unconstitutional, unethical, and fundamentally un-American.

The bill is reminiscent of Democrat President Joe Biden’s failed “Disinformation Governance Board.”

While the Biden admin’s disinfo board was shut down before it even got off the ground, thanks to a severe backlash, the push from the Left to fight so-called “disinformation” appears persistent.

RELATED ARTICLES:

One of the weirdest, most insane things happening today is the way the entire western world is being trained to freak out about “Russian propaganda” — which barely exists in the west — while ignoring the fact that we are spending every day marinating in billions of dollars worth of US empire propaganda.

The Department of Homeland Security’s (DHS’s) controversial “Disinformation Governance Board” was recently shut down after First Amendment concerns but the DHS seemingly still intends to continue its “disinformation” work.

US-based RAND Corporation think tank has recently considered what the “multiverse” might actually mean, should this technological, anthropological, sociological – and ultimately, political project actually take off.

In yet another sign that the covid vaccination agenda of globalist institutions did not do quite as well as they had originally hoped, the Rockefeller Foundation has revealed that it (along with other non-profits) has been pumping millions of dollars into a behavioral science project meant to figure out why large groups of people around the world refuse to take the jab.

The Federal Bureau of Investigation has responded to claims by Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg that the FBI pressured the social media platform to censor reports on Hunter Biden’s “Laptop from Hell.”

Staffed by NATO military officers and former government ministers and notorious for training the West’s top spies, the Department of War Studies at King’s College London is also providing the workforce for many of the largest social media companies. This includes Facebook, TikTok, Google, and Twitter.

With every passing day, the United States government borrows yet another leaf from Nazi Germany’s playbook: Secret police. Secret courts. Secret government agencies. Surveillance. Censorship. Intimidation. Harassment. Torture. Brutality. Widespread corruption. Entrapment. Indoctrination. Indefinite detention.

Leaked emails expose the fingerprints of UK intelligence all over a factually challenged BBC special that aimed to deprive antiwar academics of their jobs and destroy their reputations.

There’s clear coordination, globally, of censorship. With few exceptions, countries have taken action to criminalize free speech, and they have done so in lockstep with each other. It began in earnest with censorship of theories about the origins of SARS-CoV-2, and grew from there to include anything COVID related.