Far-right protesters in Ukraine demand Israel apologize for communism
The far-right activists called on Israel and the Jews to assume responsibility specifically for Holodomor, a famine that killed millions of Ukrainians in the 1930s.
https://www.jpost.com/diaspora/antisemitism/far-right-protesters-in-ukraine-demand-israel-apologize-for-communism-654711

https://jewishchronicle.timesofisrael.com/netanyahu-welcomes-largest-ever-delegation-of-us-lawmakers-to-israel/

What was the rhetoric of the NSC68 doctrine.

The NSC-68 doctrine, formally titled United States Objectives and Programs for National Security, was a classified National Security Council document from April 14, 1950, authored primarily by Paul Nitze and others in the U.S. State Department. It became a cornerstone of U.S. Cold War policy, shaping the rhetoric and strategy of containment against the Soviet Union. Its rhetoric was characterized by several key themes:Existential Threat of Soviet Communism: NSC-68 framed the Soviet Union as an aggressive, ideologically driven power seeking global domination. It described a fundamental clash between the "free world," led by the U.S., and the "slave society" of the Soviet system, emphasizing the incompatibility of democratic values with totalitarian communism. The document portrayed Soviet intentions as inherently expansionist, posing a dire threat to global freedom.
Urgency and Alarmism: The rhetoric was alarmist, stressing the immediate and growing danger of Soviet military and ideological power. It argued that the U.S. faced a "real risk of war" and that the Soviet Union’s capabilities were rapidly advancing, necessitating swift and decisive U.S. action to prevent global communist domination.
Moral and Ideological Superiority: NSC-68 employed a moralistic tone, casting the U.S. as the defender of freedom, democracy, and individual liberty against the oppressive, totalitarian Soviet regime. It emphasized the U.S.’s responsibility to lead the free world and protect its values, framing the Cold War as a moral crusade as much as a strategic one.
Militarization and Containment: The document advocated a massive buildup of U.S. military and economic power to counter the Soviet threat. It called for a significant increase in defense spending, development of nuclear and conventional forces, and a global strategy of containment to prevent the spread of communism. The rhetoric underscored the need for a proactive, not reactive, approach to national security.
Global Leadership and Sacrifice: NSC-68 urged the U.S. to assume a leadership role in mobilizing allies and resources worldwide. It stressed the need for national unity and sacrifice, warning that preserving freedom would require significant economic and societal commitment, including higher taxes and reallocation of resources to defense.
Binary Worldview: The rhetoric presented a stark, binary view of the world—freedom versus slavery, democracy versus totalitarianism. It left little room for nuance, portraying any compromise or coexistence with the Soviet Union as dangerous and untenable.

This rhetoric was designed to galvanize political and public support for a robust, long-term strategy to counter the Soviet Union, influencing policies like the Truman Doctrine, the Marshall Plan, and the formation of NATO. While initially classified, its ideas permeated U.S. foreign policy discourse throughout the early Cold War, reflecting a sense of urgency, moral clarity, and commitment to global leadership.

--

What was the rhetoric of the Truman doctrine?
The Truman Doctrine, articulated by President Harry S. Truman on March 12, 1947, was a pivotal U.S. foreign policy statement that shaped the early Cold War. Its rhetoric was rooted in a clear, urgent, and moralistic framing of global conflict, emphasizing a binary struggle between freedom and totalitarianism. Below is an analysis of its key rhetorical elements:Moral Dichotomy: Truman presented the world as divided between two opposing ways of life—free nations and totalitarian regimes. He framed the U.S. as the defender of democracy, liberty, and self-determination, while portraying communism (implicitly the Soviet Union) as a threat to these values. This binary was designed to rally domestic and international support by casting the U.S. as the moral leader in a global struggle.

Urgency and Crisis: The doctrine used alarmist language to underscore the immediate threat posed by communism, particularly in the context of Greece and Turkey, where Soviet influence was growing. Truman warned that without U.S. intervention, these nations could fall, triggering a domino effect of communist expansion. Phrases like "critical moment" and "grave danger" heightened the sense of urgency.

Containment as Duty: The rhetoric emphasized containment—preventing the spread of communism—as a U.S. responsibility. Truman argued that supporting "free peoples" resisting subjugation was not just strategic but a moral obligation. This framed U.S. intervention as altruistic, appealing to American ideals of freedom and justice.
Economic and Military Aid: Truman’s speech called for $400 million in aid to Greece and Turkey, blending economic and military support as tools to bolster anti-communist governments. The rhetoric avoided overt militarism, focusing instead on "assistance" to preserve sovereignty, making the policy palatable to a war-weary public.
Universal Appeal: Truman broadened the doctrine’s scope beyond Greece and Turkey, suggesting a global commitment to support nations threatened by communism. This universalized the policy, positioning the U.S. as a global guardian of democracy.
Patriotic and Unifying Language: Addressing Congress and the American public, Truman used inclusive language to unite listeners around shared values like freedom and security. He invoked American exceptionalism, suggesting the U.S. had a unique role in shaping the world’s future.

The rhetoric was effective in securing Congressional approval for aid and setting the stage for the Cold War’s containment policy. It marked a shift from isolationism to active U.S. global leadership, framing the Cold War as an ideological battle requiring sustained American commitment.

An Indispensable Ally: Israel Helps Keep America Safe, Strong and Prosperous
https://www.aipac.org/resources/indispensable-ally

Top Rabbi: America is Collapsing, Israel must Step Up as new World Superpower  
One of Israel’s most respected rabbis, Rabbi Shmuel Eliyahu, has released a statement on the status of America as a waning world superpower and a message of hope for Israel to fill the void. Rabbi Eliyahu is the Chief Rabbi of Safed and a member of the Chief Rabbinate Council
https://thesaker.is/top-rabbi-america-is-collapsing-israel-must-step-up-as-new-world-superpower/

Leaked report: Israel acknowledges Jews in fact Khazars; Secret plan for reverse migration to Ukraine 
https://blogs.timesofisrael.com/leaked-report-israel-acknowledges-jews-in-fact-khazars-secret-plan-for-reverse-migration-to-ukraine/

Zelenskyy says wants Ukraine to become a ‘big Israel’
https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2022/4/5/zelenskyy-says-wants-ukraine-to-become-a-big-israel

CIA helped forge Ukraine’s broken spy service into Mossad against Putin — now it can’t make them stop
Rebuilt from Soviet wreckage with CIA help, Ukraine’s spy agency hunts down Putin’s top allies on three continents — crossing every “red line” the White House ever feared to touch.
https://euromaidanpress.com/2025/06/08/cia-forged-ukraines-broken-spy-service-into-mossad-for-putin-now-it-cant-make-them-stop/

( JTA) — Volodymyr Zelensky, Ukraine’s Jewish president, said his country will look more like Israel, a democracy on constant military alert, than like their more relaxed European neighbors…
https://www.jta.org/2022/04/06/global/zelensky-ukraine-will-look-more-like-big-israel-than-europe-in-the-wake-of-russias-war

Keith