Explicit & NOT Debunked: Yes, This Lady IS Teaching School Kids Sex Ed with a Strap-on Dildo

October 6, 2015 in News by RBN

The Daily Sheeple

You were warned…

150914core2

150914core1

This pictures above are making their lovely way around the Internet. Some articles have proclaimed them to be an example of Common Core sex education. Some stories report this bizarre display happened in front of a bunch of middle school kids in Nebraska, while others say Jacksonville, Florida.

Well, it didn’t happen in Nebraska or Florida…and it likely wasn’t middle school kids…but the pictures are (sadly) indeed genuine.

This is apparently what sex education looks like in a Toronto, Canada high school.

Here’s what happened.

A story was sent in, and after taking in the…ahem…visual — then alternating between laughing our asses off and being completely horrified — we decided to look into it because it really does scream “hoax” but, unless that kid in the white shirt in the top two pictures was photoshopped in (which would have taken a decent amount of effort to be so convincing), how could it be?

So exactly what in the HELL is going on here?!

Most of the stories claim a kid in the class snapped these images during the sex ed presentation with a cellphone, and then go on to purport that the teacher is a 39-year-old woman named Sharon Mercer.

After searching background info on the image itself and attempting to find a proper debunking, what we found instead is that the images were originally being reported as having coming from a school in France earlier this year. But, as you can clearly see up in the top left pic, the words “HIV/AIDS” are in English. This led to a translated article in the French version of the Huffington Post.

According to French Huff Po, the woman in the pictures is not Sharon Mercer (not sure who that is), but a woman named Carlyle Jansen, owner of a sex toy shop named “Good for Her” based in Toronto.

Under the store name, Jansen also has a wide array of sex education videos up on YouTube, complete with…wait for it…a vagina puppet.

(That’s right. A vagina puppet.)

carlyleyt

And in a 2009 article from the Toronto Star, Jansen talks all about what it’s like to…yep…teach sex education in local high schools.

carlylestar
Jansen, Toronto Sex Educator, interviewed by the Toronto Star in 2009.
The tagline says, “There’s a growing demand in local high schools for Carlyle Jansen’s sex talks, which focus on the joy of eros.”

Here is a small snippet:

Recently Jansen’s skill in normalizing conversations about sex has led to invitations from Toronto high schools, usually phys. ed. or guidance teachers who realize they don’t have enough training in sex education. In the past 18 months or so, she’s been to a dozen schools to talk about sexual health including the joy of sex – something different from charts showing diligent sperm swimming up Fallopian tubes and warnings about sexually transmitted infections.

“Teens say, `We’re taught to death about STIs,’” observes Jansen. “`We want to know about relationships and sexual pleasure.’

“People get concerned when we talk about pleasure, implying that we are saying, `Go out and have sex.’ But that’s not what we’re saying.”

Jansen and her associates tell students that if they are going to have sex, here’s how to protect themselves, and these parts of the body are pleasurable. They address questions such as what to do when, in the heat of the moment, your partner says he doesn’t want to use a condom. (There are different styles and sizes of condoms, she explains, that may be more comfortable and less inhibiting.) “It’s packaging information in a way they will listen,” Jansen says. “It’s embedded in the message.”

So does “packing information in a way they will listen” include this woman getting up on a table with her legs in the air and simulating sex with a dildo, then walking around wearing a strap-on in front of a bunch of high school kids?

Because it’s pretty obvious just looking at the head, neck and shoulders of the person wearing the white shirt in the top two pictures, again, that he is not an adult.

150914core2x

Either way, the pictures are apparently legit and this woman is reportedly teaching “the joy of sex” in Canadian high schools.

Be that as it may (and now that we’ve brushed our teeth after throwing up in our mouths a little), stories come out all the time about the types of information making its way into classrooms these days and being placed directly into the minds of younger and younger and younger audiences under the banner of “sex education”.

For example, Fox News Radio reported that the image below is what’s being used to teach sex ed to five-year-old kids in Britain:

sxedphotobritain

The story was posted in 2011, but if you felt the need to jump in a time machine to go back three years just to be properly appalled, you were not alone.

Do children that young really need to know about “some ways mummies and daddies fit together,”orgasms, prostitutes, masturbation, and homosexuality versus heterosexuality?

What this really boils down to is the argument for (or against) sex education in school and just how far such education should go. Why are modern developed nations so dead set on sexualizing even our very youngest children?

For example, schools in Chicago have mandated sex ed for kindergarteners. These kids are being taught sex education where they are asked to examine alternate lifestyles such as homes that have two mommies instead of a mommy and a daddy. The curriculum follows the recommendations of The Future of Sex Education (FoSE) sponsored in part by the Society of State Leaders of Health and Physical Education that includes an advisory committee of senior officials from Planned Parenthood and the Gay, Lesbian and Straight Education Network (GLSEN).

Come on. These kids are five. What business does the influence of Planned Parenthood and GLSEN have in a kindergarten classroom?

As a parent of a public school child, what you need to realize is this: if you do not take on the responsibility of teaching your own child about sex, you are absolutely leaving it in the hands of people like you’ve read about here and whatever the government allows them to teach your kids.

And make no mistake, the government here in the U.S. has already ruled that parents do not have a fundamental right to control what material (sexual or otherwise) a public school exposes their child to. Back in 2005, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit ruled that parents essentially lose the right to have a say in what their kids are taught the moment the child walks through a public school door:

There is no fundamental right of parents to be the exclusive provider of information regarding sexual matters to their children… Parents have no due process or privacy right to override the determinations of public schools as to the information to which their children will be exposed.

So there you go, mom and dad.