Feminist Researcher Wants Men Put ‘In Some Kind of Camp’
April 7, 2016 in News by RBN Staff
Godfather Politics | by
Julie Bindel is an English writer, feminist and co-founder of the group Justice for Women. Her primary areas of interest are lesbian rights, opposition to the sex industry, modern anti-trafficking campaigns and defending female victims of domestic violence. . . . As a lesbian, she has shared her views and been quoted regarding sexual identity and sexual orientation issues and refers to herself as a political lesbian feminist.
Bindel is anti-men and anti-heterosexuality. While the war on women is a myth concocted by liberals to get women to vote for Democrats, there is a real ideological war against men, and Bindel is a perfect example of one of its militant soldiers.
In an interview with the website radfem collective, “Bindel says that she would ‘put … all [men] in some kind of camp where they can all drive around in quad bikes, or bicycles, or white vans.”
I hope heterosexuality doesn’t survive, actually. I would like to see a truce on heterosexuality. I would like an amnesty on heterosexuality until we have sorted ourselves out. Because under patriarchy it’s shit.
That’s not all:
And I am sick of hearing from individual women that their men are all right. Those men have been shored up by the advantages of patriarchy and they are complacent, they are not stopping other men from being shit.
I would love to see a women’s liberation that results in women turning away from men and saying: “when you come back as human beings, then we might look again.”
She also declared that we “have to get rid of” gender — “abolish and obliterate it” — because it is “an imposition of subordination on women.”
Admittedly, Julie Bindel and her small group of radical feminists belong to a fringe group, but today’s fringe group is tomorrow’s mainstream decision from the Supreme Court. Dr. Gary North writes that as men and women become more epistemologically self-conscious over time, “they become more consistent intellectually with their first principles of life.” As a result, they “become less ethically self-conscious as they become more epistemologically self-conscious.”
With no fixed moral reference point from which to ground ethics, a new morality is forced on the masses as the new moral standard.
