Life Insurer Refuses To Cover COVID Vaccine Death Claiming The Victim Took Part In An Experiment At His Own Risk

January 19, 2022 in News by RBN Staff


Source: Great Game India


Despite the fact that vaccination was recognized as the reason of mortality by doctors and insurance companies, the life insurer has refused to cover COVID vaccine death claiming that the victim, a rich entrepreneur took part in an experiment at his own risk. An experimental vaccine that results in fatality, according to the corporation, is equivalent to suicide.

The reason for this is that the complications of the Corona injections are well recognized and widely publicized. They contend that the deceased participated in an experiment at his own risk. Covid-19 is not considered a “critical illness” in and of itself.

An experimental vaccine that results in fatality, according to the corporation, is equivalent to suicide

The insurance provider explained its objection to compensate the family by noting that the consumption of experimental medications or therapies, such as Corona shots, is specifically prohibited by the insurance policy. Following that, the family filed a case against the insurance company, which was unfruitful.

The following is supposedly how the court rationalized its decision: “The side effects of the experimental vaccine are published and the deceased could not claim to have known nothing about it when he voluntarily took the vaccine. There is no law or mandate in France that compelled him to be vaccinated. Hence his death is essentially suicide.” The insurance company declines to compromise because suicide isn’t really insured by the contract from the start.

Scandalous verdict: taking a life-threatening risk is considered suicide under the law

“The court recognizes the classification of the insurer who, in view of the announced side effects, including death, legally regards participation in the phase three experiment, whose proven harmlessness is not given, as voluntarily taking a fatal risk that is not covered by the contract and legally recognized as suicide. The family has appealed. However, the insurer’s defense is recognized as well-founded and contractually justified, as this publicly known fatal risk is legally considered suicide, since the customer has been notified and has agreed to voluntarily take the risk of death without being obliged or compelled to do so.”