Omicron and Virology’s Alchemy

December 14, 2021 in Columnists, News by RBN Staff



Dr. Mark J Bailey

8 December 2021

In our essay, “The COVID-19 Fraud & War on Humanity,” Dr. John Bevan-Smith and I described the COVID-19 situation as being composed of “numerous preposterous claims”.  The recent announcement of the Omicron ‘variant’ is set to add another chapter to the book of preposterous claims.  A chapter concerning more of modern virology’s magical creations.

Within days of the “discovery”, the new buzz-word ‘Omicron’ was being spread around the world. Once more, all sorts of claims were being made without any sound scientific evidence about not only what was happening, but what could be expected to happen next.  The variant was purported to have been detected in South Africa on 24 November 2021 and just two days later it was designated a “variant of concern” by the World Health Organisation’s Technical Advisory Group on Virus Evolution.

We read that with regards to Omicron, “the WHO is concerned that the large number of mutations may reduce immunity in people who were previously infected and in vaccinated people.”  This timely claim seems to be a convenient explanation as, just a few weeks earlier, both Bill Gates and Dr. Antony Fauci admitted that the COVID “vaccines” don’t work as originally advertised.  However, the solution according to this duet is the same song and the lyrics predictably involve more vaccines.

We are also informed that “no unusual symptoms have yet been associated with the variant and, as with other variants, some individuals are asymptomatic.”  This is disingenuous and is simply repeating the fact that by the WHO’s own definiton, a “COVID-19” case can be confirmed solely by a Nucleic Acid Amplification Test (i.e. a PCR “test”).  Additionally, a Cochrane Review concluded that with regards to COVID-19 “neither absence nor presence of signs or symptoms are accurate enough to rule in or rule out disease.”  The whole “pandemic” is based on the fact that COVID-19 is not a definable clinical entity and thus any presentation, even if completely asymptomatic, can be classified as another case of the imaginary disease.

The WHO’s paper “Enhancing Readiness for Omicron (B.1.1.529): Technical Brief and Priority Actions for Member States” is another example of the anti-science being used to sustain this fake pandemic.  They state that because there are 26-32 amino acid changes in the spike protein sequence there may be “S gene target failure” – in other words, the current PCR kits will not detect this sequence and they may only detect one or two of the other selected sequences.  Not surprisingly the PCR kit manufacturers, along with the WHO, suggest that this doesn’t necessarily mean the person is negative for COVID-19.  In fact, in this Orwellian sinkhole, they say the absence of the sequence could now be a marker for the Omicron variant.  This opens a door to manufacture more cases as a negative aspect of an alleged test for “COVID-19” can now mean that you are positive for “COVID-19” in their ‘heads I win, tails you lose’ game.

The Omicron variant is no different from the Delta variant or any other variant past or present in that none of them have been shown to exist in nature.  All of them are simply computer created “genomes” from unpurified specimens.  No Omicron variant virus was found because no virus was found.  Instead, variations in sequences are found which reflects both the inability of the process to be replicated as well as newly detected sequences in the environment which are claimed (without proof) to be viral in origin.  Thus it was no surprise that within days the Omicron invention was being “found” simultaneously all around the world.

This fraudulent “detection” technique invites all sorts of explanations from the virologists and other commentators.  In a recent Science article, we see some examples of their analyses on the origins of Omicron:

“I assume this evolved not in South Africa, where a lot of sequencing is going on, but somewhere else in southern Africa during the winter wave.”

– Christian Drosten, virologist

“I’m not sure there’s really anywhere in the world that is isolated enough for this sort of  virus to transmit for that length of time without it emerging in various places.”

– Andrew Rambaut, evolutionary biologist

            “It does make me wonder if other species out there can become chronically infected, which would potentially provide this sort of selective pressure over time”

– Aris Katzourakis, evolutionary biologist

Because of the flawed methodology involving simply detecting genetic sequences in the environment and declaring this constitutes evidence of a virus, any work of fiction is possible from these “experts”.  The reality is not once has a whole particle confirmed to be SARS-CoV-2 been found inside an individual.  Not once has such a particle been properly physically isolated with purification and shown to contain even one of the over 5 million “genomes” now posted on  Not once has such a particle been shown to be the causal agent of any disease.  Similarly for the spike protein alleged to belong to the virus for which the GISAID site includes a sophisticated 3D animation of its variants.

However, all of the computer models in the world don’t change the fact that the detected genetic sequences and proteins have never been shown to be part of a pathogenic virus.  Due to its ongoing failures to demonstrate that alleged viral particles are capable of causing disease in a living host, virology is becoming nothing more than computer simulations.  Omicron is the latest update in their virtual reality that is becoming increasingly disconnected from the natural world.

Not missing a chance to cash in on Omicron, Richard Hatchett, CEO of the Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovations (CEPI), proclaimed that Omicron’s emergence had fulfilled predictions that transmission of the virus in areas with low vaccination rates would speed its evolution.  It is unclear what data Hatchett is referring to in order to make such “predictions”.  CEPI, his employer was launched in 2017 at the World Economic Forum and its major funders include the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation and the Wellcome Trust.  Its scientific advisory committee has executives from Pfizer, Johnson & Johnson and the Takeda Pharmaceutical Company.  Not surprisingly these organisations are all suggesting that there’s only one solution to the “problem” and that’s more of their vaccines.

The “vaccines” offer no solutions unless the goal is human experimentation with genetic vectors and transfers of wealth and control to globalist affiliated organisations.  Virology in its current iteration has resorted to alchemic thinking and should be shelved unless it can demonstrate a return to the scientific method.  If not, expect another “variant” and more fictional narratives to make an appearance in your news feed some time soon.  The safest way to protect yourself from Omicron is to ignore it altogether, along with the medical tyranny that promotes such illusions.  Like everything COVID-19, Omicron’s capacity to cause disease is limited by its ability to infect the minds of the susceptible with a fear-based narrative.