WASHINGTON POST: “The U.S. Coast Guard will no longer classify swastikas, nooses as hate symbols”
November 20, 2025 in News by RBN Staff
*Note: The above headline published by The Washington Post was quickly repudiated by the US Coast Guard. It seems to be a semantic argument regarding the terms ‘hate symbols’ versus ‘prohibited symbols’.
Source: TheHill.com
Coast Guard denies report it won’t classify swastikas, nooses as hate symbols
The Coast Guard said Thursday a Washington Post report that claimed it will no longer classify swastikas and nooses as hate symbols is “categorically false.”
“The claims that the U.S. Coast Guard will no longer classify swastikas, nooses or other extremist imagery as prohibited symbols are categorically false. These symbols have been and remain prohibited in the Coast Guard per policy,” Adm. Kevin Lunday, acting Coast Guard commandant, said in a statement.
The Post reported the branch, part of the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), will classify swastikas, widely recognized as a symbol of the German Nazi Party and linked to the killing of millions of Jews, as “potentially divisive,” along with the Confederate flag and nooses, citing documents it obtained.
The new policy is set to go into effect Dec. 15, and if the “potentially divisive” symbol is reported, supervisors will have to investigate and could direct it to be removed after advising with the legal office, the Post reported.
The DHS strongly pushed back on the report, calling it an “absolute ludicrous lie and unequivocally false.”
“The @washingtonpost should be embarrassed it published this fake crap,” DHS spokesperson Tricia McLaughlin said in a Thursday post on social platform X.
“Y’all are just making things up now,” the DHS said in another post on X.
Coast Guard personnel will have 45 days to report a display of swastikas or nooses, according to the new policy, the newspaper reported.
According to the branch’s 2019 guidance, commanders within the Coast Guard could direct that swastikas, nooses or other emblems be removed even if they are not deemed as a “potential hate incident.”
“The following is a non-exhaustive list of symbols whose display, presentation, creation, or depiction would constitute a potential hate incident: a noose, a swastika, supremacist symbols, Confederate symbols or flags, and antiSemitic symbols, among many others,” the Coast Guard said in the guidance.
“The display of these type symbols constitutes a potential hate incident because hate based groups have co-opted them as symbols of supremacy, racial intolerance, religious intolerance, or other bias,” the service said. ”Symbols can be presented as images, on any type of material or clothing, as words or numbers, and, in any combination.”
The Coast Guard stated in its new policy, which was published this month, that the “terminology ‘hate incident’ is no longer present in policy.”
“Conduct previously handled as a potential hate incident, including those involving symbols widely identified with oppression or hatred, is processed as a report of harassment in cases with an identified aggrieved individual, or in accordance with Chapter 11 of this Instruction,” the Coast Guard wrote.
In the statement Thursday, Lunday, the acting commandant, said, “The Coast Guard remains unwavering in its commitment to fostering a safe, respectful and professional workplace. Symbols such as swastikas, nooses and other extremist or racist imagery violate our core values and are treated with the seriousness they warrant under current policy.”
