Strange typographical technique spells ‘Comey’ as ‘Corney’ in offical documents.

December 9, 2019 in News by RBN Staff

 

Source: Jim Stone

https://www.justice.gov/storage/120919-examination.pdf

Well, the Fisa report JUST DROPPED

and despite wanting to ignore it I could not resist and combed it for goodies.

UPDATE: I am shamed to admit I peeked at what I knew would be crap, AND IT IS STUPID FAR BEYOND ALL EXPECTATIONS. I think it actually broke the law. Additionally it has key critical redactions that don’t have anything to do with national security at all. I predict full on frontal GARBAGE.

OK, WE GOT THE ANSWER, THE REPORT IS A CRIME AGAINST THE UNITED STATES, HERE’S THE KEY LINE THAT PROVES IT: “Although we also found no evidence that Corney had been made aware of these issues at the time he certified the application” PUT A FORK IN IT, SHE’S DONE JUST LIKE I SAID. It is not a report at all, THEY ARE CALLING COMEY CORNEY AND ARE EXPECTING PEOPLE TO ACCEPT IT. THIS APPEARS ALL THROUGH THE REPORT, “COMEY” IS NOT EVEN MENTIONED ONCE. THIS IS GRADE SCHOOL LEVEL DEBAUCHERY.

You can’t even search “Comey” in the document, if you want to find “Comey” you have to type “Corney”. What an insult!!!

OK, I CHECKED THE DOCUMENT FOR “COMEY” AND GOT ZERO HITS. I THEN CHECKED IT FOR “CORNEY” AND GOT 149 HITS. AND THEY USED A FONT THAT TURNS THE R AND THE N INTO AN M. THAT PROVES DECEPTION, THIS THING IS AS FAKE AS FRUIT LOOPS.

Both normal R’s and normal N’s appear throughout the document which means a special R and a special N were made in the font that don’t use the R and the N keys to get a fake “M” to show. Take a look, it is obvious.

With deception at this high a level in plain sight, it proves this document is not trustworthy. They actually made a special font to prevent “Comey” from ever being actually named in it. This also prevents searches for “Comey” from working.

This report is brilliantly written sh*t speak so perfect it flaunts legitimacy like a transvestite “bake my cake” lawsuit yet is so fake Comey’s not even in it. It comes off as so pristine and so legit it makes my blood boil, because it is not even a whitewash, it is from a legal perspective a useless document.

 

[RBN note: The same technique appears to be used in other official documents as well:
search here: https://oig.justice.gov/reports/2019/o1902.pdf ]