TRUMP EO on Aliens – Supreme Court has Ruled on Executive Power of President – So what is the Problem Here.
February 11, 2017 in News by RBN Staff
In 8 U.S.C. § 1182(f), which is an unambiguous codified Statute of the United States that PRECLUDES all judicial actions; and, the term of “aliens” defined as “means” is the exclusive use required as defined in 8 U.S.C. § 1101(a)(3) and then check out definitions of 8 U.S.C. § 1101(a)(21 & 22).
There is NO mention of “Muslims” or “Islam” as the use of “means” limits the use of “aliens” to the exclusive to the “term” definition. Groman v. Commissioner, 302 U.S. 82, 86, (1937) “[W]hen an exclusive definition is intended the word ‘means’ is employed,”
I have attached a module on “unambiguous” and “means.”
Also it seems to me that this issue was determined in United States ex rel Knauff v. Shaughnessy, 338 U.S. 537, 543-544 (Sup.Ct. 1950)
Attachments:
8 U.S.C. § 1182(f)—Inadmissible Aliens
8 U.S.C. § 1101(a)(3), (a)(21 & 22)[pg. 12]—Definitions – “aliens”, “national” & “national of the United States”
Unambiguous module
Means module
Comments Welcome.
DoJ attorney oral argument was a “D “ – not good, but with Sessions in, that will change I am sure.
Ralph